Koliko imamo dimenzija? (rasprava o ideologiji i umetnosti razvijenog elektronskog društva)

Abstract

Developed industrial society with its onedimensionality has found his critical theory in Marxism, and the root of artistic theory in a modified formalism which forced the cancellation of the aesthetic age. This, in essence ugliness age, which does violence to all forms of intangible activities subjecting them non-value goods, „which” the revenge of the art, which parodies the reproducibility and productivity (which are basically the industrial age). Pop art and Conceptual art, Fluxus and Happening stand processuality as free speech inside the form. It is a unique way of survival of the art. What happens in the time after the industry? As the technological era with its one-dimension multiplied, under the banner highlighting the differences (in the copy), not sameness, it also endangers the right art at some autonomy? The political unconscious of contemporary art is being built in a top simulacrum: Same-Same-Same... - Different. Economic and productive field longer base already starting point, while the constructivist principle today aimed at breaking a whole, rather than on creating heterogeneous superstructure as the historical avantgarde (which is a practical aid formalist theory). What are the new designs? What are the modern ideologems? Is there a transition model or opposition are deadlocked and unable agon? And is it still possible utopian projection art as „libidinal satisfactory work” or producing assessable non-economic goods. We owe very much to the Russian formalism that today in this way we think about art and spent speaking about literature?