Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/13270
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseopenAccess-
dc.contributor.authorStarčević, Jelena-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-10T11:24:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-10T11:24:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676041947en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/13270-
dc.description.abstractSimultaneously with the development of inclusive education worldwide, studies aiming to reveal and refine understanding of teachers’ attitudes towards work with children with additional support needs are being conducted. Previous research of teacher-related variables, such as their education and practice, resulted in obtaining only a small number of consistently significant determinants of attitudes towards inclusive education. Unlike most of the previous research, this study is concerned with a different category of plausible determinants – psychological dispositions which may form attitudes towards work with children with additional support needs. The variables from emotional and cognitive realm were selected: emotional self-efficacy, belief in a just world, and cognitive rigidity. The importance of these predictors was examined in a sample of 166 students of the Faculty of Education. During the first phase, students responded to an emotional intelligence scale, belief in a just world scale, and to a non-verbal test of cognitive rigidity. In the second phase they responded to a scale of attitudes towards inclusive education of children with disabilities. The results revealed relatively complex and significant relationships between named predictors and attitudes. The emotional self-efficacy had a positive and non-moderated influence on students’ attitudes (β = 24, p=.004). The relation between belief in a just world and attitudes was moderated by the cognitive rigidity. When cognitive rigidity of the respondents was low, belief in a just world had no influence, but in a case of high cognitive rigidity, this belief became the strongest predictor of attitudes (β = 35, p = .001). The relatively high proportion of attitudes’ variance was explained by examined models of predictors (16.9 ≤ R2 ≤ 17.4). Pedagogical implications of the obtained findings are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Education in Jagodinaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourcePROFESSIONAL COMPETENCES FOR TEACHING IN THE 21ST CENTURYen_US
dc.sourceProceedings of the International Conference Professional Competences for Teaching in the 21st Century Organised by the Faculty of Education in Jagodina on May 23−25, 2019en_US
dc.subjectinclusive educationen_US
dc.subjectemotional self-efficacyen_US
dc.subjectbelief in a just worlden_US
dc.subjectcognitive rigidityen_US
dc.subjectstudents of faculty of educationen_US
dc.titlePredictors of Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education Among Students of the Faculty of Educationen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/pctja.19.506Sen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Education, Jagodina

Page views(s)

477

Downloads(s)

48

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PCFT-33-20.pdf283.3 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons