Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND-
dc.contributor.authorVlašković, Veljko-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T18:22:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-08T18:22:40Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676231089en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14138-
dc.description.abstractBy its decision in case Goodwin v. United Kingdom (2002), The European Court of Human Rights has recognized the positive obligation of states to provide conditions for the legal recognition of preferred gender in the context of the right to respect for private life. In this regard, the Court emphasized gender identity as an important element of personal identity and an integral part of the transgender person's right to private life. On the other hand, states have kept their margin of appreciation regarding requirements needed for changing gender data in civil registries or in other words legal recognition of preferred gender. After Goodwin case, that has laid foundations for the rights of transgender people to gender identity, further development of this right was set by the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in case A.P., Garçon and Nicot v. France (2017). By this decision, the Court has further narrow the margin of appreciation removing imposing of sterilisation as a requirement for legal gender recognition. Finally, The European Court of Human Rights has taken the position in the latest judgment X and Y. v. Romania (2021) that conditioning legal recognition of preferred gender with surgical interventions of gender reassignment represents breach of the right to respect private life. Thus, the Court further approached Council of Europe Resolution 1728 (2010) according to which states are suggested to remove from the requirements for legal gender recognition the subjection to any medical service of gender reassignment, including hormone therapy. Domestic legislation has retained only hormone therapy as a necessary condition for legal gender reassignment. Although this solution is in accordance with the latest case law of the European Court of Human Rights, another step is needed to make the exercise of the right to gender identity adjusted to the "soft law" of the Council of Europe and the bodies under the auspices of the United Nations.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law in Kragujevacen_US
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceXXI VEK – VEK USLUGA I USLUŽNOG PRAVA, Knjiga XIIen_US
dc.subjecttranssexualen_US
dc.subjectgender identityen_US
dc.subjecthormone therapyen_US
dc.subjectsurgical interventionsen_US
dc.subjectsterilisationen_US
dc.subjectthe right to private lifeen_US
dc.titleMEDICINSKE USLUGE POLNOG PRILAGOĐAVANjA KAO USLOV ZA PRAVNU PROMENU POLA U SVETLU PRAKSE EVROPSKOG SUDA ZA LjUDSKA PRAVAen_US
dc.title.alternativeMEDICAL SERVICES OF GENDER REASSIGNMENT AS A REQUIREMENT FOR LEGAL GENDER RECOGNITION IN THE LIGHT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHT CASE-LAWen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/XXIv-12.199Ven_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

100

Downloads(s)

8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
199-209.pdf206.14 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons