Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14200
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseopenAccess-
dc.contributor.authorPavlovic, Jelena-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-10T19:14:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-10T19:14:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1450-8338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14200-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we have analyzed specific linguistic and cultural representations of food within the codes of law, regulations and legal acts of the Principality of Serbia from the years 1840, 1845 and 1847. We employed historical discourse analysis, historical sociolinguistics, and general cultural studies of food as a base framework for our research. We have established that food has a marginalized status within the observed documents. We can differentiate between basic food consisting of bread and side dishes (food served for specific categories of citizens, such as soldiers, prisoners, and the ill) and luxurious food. The status of luxurious food is manifested by the presence of lexemes of foreign origin within the list of groceries. We can highlight three types of food discourse: (a) economic discourse; (b) discourse of the state acting as a protector of its people; (c) medical discourse. The main motivational factor to engage in talk about food is the economic interest and in those situations one can encounter food in a public place (such as customs, quarantine, farmer’s market). A discourse which governs other types of discourses is the discourse of the state acting as a protector. The state protects its food sources, especially focusing on the protection of the poor. Famine is not addressed directly, but implications of hunger can be discerned from some legal acts. The medical discourse is most prominent in the regulations concerning quarantine and border meetings, where the Fishler’s omnivore’s paradox and incorporation principle dominates the quarantine organization. The state is metaphorically perceived as a body, and the quarantine is a customs official whose job is to check whether a certain food item carries contagious diseases.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevacen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceLipar, Journal for Literature, Language, Art and Cultureen_US
dc.subjectfooden_US
dc.subject19th centuryen_US
dc.subjectlegal languageen_US
dc.subjecthistorical discourse analyisen_US
dc.subjectthe omnivore’s paradoxen_US
dc.titleREPREZENTACIJA HRANE U „ZBORNICIMA ZAKONA I UREDABA ZA KNEŽEVINU SRBIJU“ IZ PETE DECENIJE 19. VEKAen_US
dc.title.alternativeREPRESENTATION OF FOOD WITHIN THE CODES OF LAW AND REGULATIONS OF THE PRINICIPALITY OF SERBIA FROM THE 5TH DECADE OF THE 19TH CENTURY (LINGUISTIC AND CULTURAL ASPECTS)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/LIPAR73.145PJen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)

Page views(s)

452

Downloads(s)

46

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
145-157.pdf338.17 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons