Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14736
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseopenAccess-
dc.contributor.authorVlašković, Veljko-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:56:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:56:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676230846en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14736-
dc.description.abstractSince the beginning of October 2017, Serbia has faced with measles virus infection outbreak which proved once more the necessity of children compulsory immunisation against that highly infectious disease. Serbia adopted law on mandatory vaccination against measles for all children of certain age, as well as measures of recommended passive immunisation of the individual child in case of measles clinical indications. Rules on compulsory active immunisation for children against measles are in accordance with the public health interests and the child's right to life, survival and development. Simultaneously, children mandatory vaccination amounts to an interference with the child's right to private life, but such interference pursues legitimate aim in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights and case law of the Strasbourg Court. Furthermore, the interference is also justified from the aspects of parent's right to family life since it is necessary for protection of public health interests and rights and freedoms of others, which was also affirmed by the decision of the Constitutional Court of Serbia. Regarding the recommended passive immunisation of a child, parental consent to this medical treatment should be considered as making decision on issues that seriously affect the life of a child in terms of family legislation. That is why it is necessary to have explicit consent of both parents to their child passive immunisation in cases when a child is under the age of 15, or in situations when a child who reached this age having sufficient mental capacity did not consent to medical treatment of passive immunisation.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Kragujevacen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceXXI VEK – VEK USLUGA I USLUŽNOG PRAVA, Knjiga IXen_US
dc.subjectmeasles, compulsory active immunisationen_US
dc.subjectpublic health, child's rightsen_US
dc.subjectparental responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectthe right to family lifeen_US
dc.titleIMUNIZACIJA DECE PROTIV MALIH BOGINjA SA ASPEKTA PRAVA DETETA I VRŠENjA RODITELjSKIH DUŽNOSTIen_US
dc.title.alternativeCHILDREN IMMUNISATION AGAINST MEASLES FROM THE ASPECTs OF CHILD'S rights AND PARENTAL RESPONISBILITYen_US
dc.typebookParten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/XXIv-9.279Ven_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

409

Downloads(s)

12

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1 XXI vek - vek usluga i Usluznog prava 9. - PDF-279-292.pdf238.04 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons