Молимо вас користите овај идентификатор за цитирање или овај линк до ове ставке:
https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14744
Пун извештај метаподатака
Поље DC-а | Вредност | Језик |
---|---|---|
dc.rights.license | openAccess | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vučićević, Ana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rakić, Aleksandra | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T09:58:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T09:58:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Vučićević, A. L., & Rakić, A. D. (2020). Textual metadiscourse in academic book reviews in Serbian and English. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prištini, 50(3), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRFFP50-23692 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0354-3293 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14744 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the forms and patterns of use of the markers of textual metadiscourse in the academic book reviews from the fields of humanities (linguistics and literature) and social sciences (sociology, history, and ethnography) in both Serbian and English languages. The principal aim of our research was to attempt to establish a potential variation in the use of these markers with regard to the parameters of the type of markers, discipline, and language in which the reviews were written. The qualitative-quantitative analysis was carried out according to the model provided by Blagojević (2008). As for the first parameter, the comparison showed the predominance of logical textual connectives in comparison to both other textual connectives and markers of discourse actions/references to discourse across disciplines and languages. When it comes to the parameter of discipline, linguistics, literature and sociology reviews contained the greatest number of markers. Regarding the language criterion, cumulatively speaking, more markers were observed in the reviews in Serbian than in the reviews in English. However, the difference was rather subtle and it pointed to similarities rather than disparities in the use of these markers. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Priština, Faculty of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
dc.source | Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prištini | en_US |
dc.subject | academic discourse | en_US |
dc.subject | textual metadiscourse | en_US |
dc.subject | academic book reviews | en_US |
dc.subject | disciplines | en_US |
dc.subject | Serbian | en_US |
dc.subject | English | en_US |
dc.title | Textual metadiscourse in academic book reviews in Serbian and English | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Tekstualni metadiskurs u akademskim prikazima knjiga na srpskom i engleskom jeziku | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.description.version | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5937/ZRFFP50-23692 | en_US |
dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | en_US |
Налази се у колекцијама: | The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM) |
Датотеке у овој ставци:
Датотека | Опис | Величина | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0354-32932003269V.pdf | 314.05 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Погледајте |
Ова ставка је заштићена лиценцом Креативне заједнице