Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/18575
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorŽivojinović, Dj, Dragica-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T19:24:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-11T19:24:11Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676231218en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/18575-
dc.descriptionRad je napisan u okviru Programa istraživanja Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu za 2023. godinu koji se finansira iz sredstava Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije.en_US
dc.description.abstractHarvesting the organs of the deceased is the primary source of procuring human organs adequate for transplantation. Therefore, the key issue that needs to be regulated in transplantation laws is the donor's consent for post-mortem harvesting of organs for the purpose of transplantation. In this paper, the author analyzes two dominant models of donor's consent in contemporary European legislation as a condition for permitted harvesting of the deceased person's organs – the model of express consent and the model of presumed consent, as well as the model of consent that has been adopted in Serbian law. The author's interest also revolves around other potential solutions: the mixed model, the system in which the harvesting of organs is justified by the necessity in emergency situations and the concept of mandatory choice. In this paper the author points to the advantages and weaknesses of each model and reviews how the regulations tackle the issue whether the lack of donor's consent for post-mortem harvesting of his organs can be replaced with the consent of family members. In the concluding remarks, the author presents the arguments why the models of express consent is a more acceptable option and argues that the choice of the donor's consent model is not crucial for increasing the number of organ donors, but rather the action coming from several levels aimed at raising the awarness of citizens of the significance of organ donation.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Kragujevacen_US
dc.relation.ispartofXIX majsko savetovanje, Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unijeen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectorgan transplantationen_US
dc.subjectharvesting organs from the deceaseden_US
dc.subjectright to self-determinationen_US
dc.subjectexpress consenten_US
dc.subjectpresumed consenten_US
dc.subjectconsent of the deceased family membersen_US
dc.titlePRISTANAK DAVAOCA KAO USLOV DOPUSTIVOG UZIMANjA ORGANA SA UMRLOG LICA U SVRHU TRANSPLANTACIJEen_US
dc.title.alternativeTHE CONSENT OF THE DONOR AS A CONDITION OF PERMITTED HARVESTING OF THE DECEASED PERSON'S ORGANS FOR TRANSPLANTATION PURPOSESen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/XIXMajsko.573Zen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

28

Downloads(s)

6

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu EU 2023-19-1186-573-590.pdf280.01 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons