Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/18575
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.rights.license | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.contributor.author | Živojinović, Dj, Dragica | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-11T19:24:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-11T19:24:11Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788676231218 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/18575 | - |
dc.description | Rad je napisan u okviru Programa istraživanja Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu za 2023. godinu koji se finansira iz sredstava Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Harvesting the organs of the deceased is the primary source of procuring human organs adequate for transplantation. Therefore, the key issue that needs to be regulated in transplantation laws is the donor's consent for post-mortem harvesting of organs for the purpose of transplantation. In this paper, the author analyzes two dominant models of donor's consent in contemporary European legislation as a condition for permitted harvesting of the deceased person's organs – the model of express consent and the model of presumed consent, as well as the model of consent that has been adopted in Serbian law. The author's interest also revolves around other potential solutions: the mixed model, the system in which the harvesting of organs is justified by the necessity in emergency situations and the concept of mandatory choice. In this paper the author points to the advantages and weaknesses of each model and reviews how the regulations tackle the issue whether the lack of donor's consent for post-mortem harvesting of his organs can be replaced with the consent of family members. In the concluding remarks, the author presents the arguments why the models of express consent is a more acceptable option and argues that the choice of the donor's consent model is not crucial for increasing the number of organ donors, but rather the action coming from several levels aimed at raising the awarness of citizens of the significance of organ donation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | sr | en_US |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.source | XIX majsko savetovanje, Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije | - |
dc.subject | organ transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject | harvesting organs from the deceased | en_US |
dc.subject | right to self-determination | en_US |
dc.subject | express consent | en_US |
dc.subject | presumed consent | en_US |
dc.subject | consent of the deceased family members | en_US |
dc.title | PRISTANAK DAVAOCA KAO USLOV DOPUSTIVOG UZIMANjA ORGANA SA UMRLOG LICA U SVRHU TRANSPLANTACIJE | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | THE CONSENT OF THE DONOR AS A CONDITION OF PERMITTED HARVESTING OF THE DECEASED PERSON'S ORGANS FOR TRANSPLANTATION PURPOSES | en_US |
dc.type | conferenceObject | en_US |
dc.description.version | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.46793/XIXMajsko.573Z | en_US |
dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Law, Kragujevac |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu EU 2023-19-1186-573-590.pdf | 280.01 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License