Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19493
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJanevska, Marija N.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T18:39:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-28T18:39:48Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn14508338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19493-
dc.descriptionThe research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (Agreement on the Realization and Funding of Scientific Research NIO in 2023 No. 451-03-47/2023-01/ 200198).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on the findings of a contrastive study of American English high back vowels /u, ʊ/ and Serbian vowel /u/ produced by ten male native speakers of Serbian. Previous research (Marković 2009a; Bjekić, Čubrović 2021; Čubrović 2019, 2017; Dančetović, Nešić 2017) has indicated that the differences in quality between the English high back vowels /u/ and /ʊ/ are often poorly detected by Serbian speakers. Therefore, the overall aim of the present research is to observe the acoustic properties of high back vowels in the given languages, so as to determine whether or not our subjects can adequately produce the L2 vowels with respect to both quality and quantity, and whether they can differentiate them from their L1 categories. The research subjects were first instructed to read a set of 13 monosyllabic English words representing the high back vowels /u, ʊ/ in different phonetic environments. The second task called for the subjects to read a set of 13 Serbian words representing the vowel /u/ in short and long stressed syllables. The collected speech samples were then analyzed acoustically using Praat, version 6.2.13 (Boersma, Weenink 2022). The statistical analysis of the acoustic measurements was performed using R, version 4.2.1 (R Development Core Team 2022). The results suggest that, in terms of quantity, in the speech of Serbian students, the lax vowel, in particular, bears more resemblance to the subjects’ L1 category, rather than the targeted vowel. The analysis of the formant data indicates that, although our subjects’ L2 categories differ from those of native speakers, the quality of GA high back vowels our subjects produce does not reflect the quality of their L1 categories.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kragujevac, Faculty of Filology and Artsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLipar, časopis za književnost, jezik, umetnost i kulturuen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectvowel qualityen_US
dc.subjectvowel quantityen_US
dc.subjectmonophthongen_US
dc.subjecthigh back vowelsen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Americanen_US
dc.subjectStandard Serbianen_US
dc.titleTHE PRODUCTION OF HIGH BACK VOWELS: A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF AMERICAN ENGLISH AND STANDARD SERBIANen_US
dc.title.alternativePRODUKCIJA VISOKIH VOKALA ZADNjEG REDA: KONTRASTIVNA ANALIZA AMERIČKOG ENGLESKOG I STANDARDNOG SRPSKOG JEZIKAen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/LIPAR81.155Jen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)

Page views(s)

76

Downloads(s)

18

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lipar 81-155-174.pdf261.1 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons