Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19856
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.contributor.authorŽivojinović, Dj, Dragica-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-12T07:32:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-12T07:32:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676231270en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19856-
dc.descriptionRad je napisan u okviru Programa istraživanja Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu za 2023. godinu koji se finansira iz sredstava Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije.en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the conditions for lawful harvesting of deceased organs for the purpose of transplantation is the existing of an explicit or presumed consent of the organ donor. Apart the fulfillment of this condition, majority of European countries foresee the right of third parties, people close to the deceased, to permit organ donation if the deceased had not given an explicit consent, or to reject this medical procedure if the deceased had not done it during his life time. The subject of this paper is to review European supranational and national legislations in order to determine which parties have the right to make decisions (along with or instead of the deceased) in relation to postmortal explantation of his/her organs, what is the scope of their authorities and and what are the boundaries for their execution. The author of this paper suggests that instead of using wider formulations, such as: the deceased relatives, the deceased family members, etc., it is necessary to define the scope of third parties and make a precise order in which they will be invited to make a decision, as well as what a medical team should do if there are several parties of the same rank. Also, the author concludes that postmortal organ donation should primarily be based on the deceased will which he expressed during his/her life time, suggesting that a decision of the deceased close relatives to override his/her will would constitute the violation of the person's right to self-determination and autonomy.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Kragujevacen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.sourceXXI vek – vek usluga i uslužnog prava, knjiga XIV-
dc.subjectorgan transplantationen_US
dc.subjectpostmortal organ donationen_US
dc.subjectexplicit consenten_US
dc.subjectpresumed consenten_US
dc.subjectpermission/opposing of organ explantationen_US
dc.subjectpersons close to the deceaseden_US
dc.titlePRAVO TREĆIH LICA DA ODLUČUJU O UZIMANjU ORGANA SA TELA PREMINULOG U SVRHU TRANSPLANTACIJEen_US
dc.title.alternativeTHE RIGHT OF THIRD PARTIES TO MAKE DECISIONS ON HARVESTING DECEASED ORGANS FOR TRANSLPLATATION PURPOSESen_US
dc.typebookParten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/XXIv-14.249Zen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

315

Downloads(s)

3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Usluge 14-249-265.pdf262.05 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons