Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/20540
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPavićević, Aleksandra-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-08T08:30:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-08T08:30:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2367-7007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/20540-
dc.description.abstractIus retentionis in Roman law represents the legal construction recognized sporadically, by decision of the praetor; in order to preserve equity in mutual debtоr-creditor relations. Due to the lack of a statutory rule, differentiation from some similar institutes in the doctrine is not clear enough. The author distinguishes ius retentionis of some institutes of Roman Law on Obligations and Real law, which have certain similarities in structure and legal effect with retention. The conclusion is that this institute represents an authentic legal remedy of ius honorarium, which is different from: compensation; objection to an uncompleted contract; fiducia and pignus.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSofia : Juridičeski fakultet. Sofijski universitet Sv. "Kliment Ohridski", 2015en_US
dc.relation.ispartofIus Romanum [Elektronski izvor]en_US
dc.subjectius retentionisen_US
dc.subjectcompensatioen_US
dc.subjectexceptio non adimpleti contractusen_US
dc.subjectfiduciaen_US
dc.subjectpignusen_US
dc.titleSIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN IUS RETENTIONIS AND RELATED INSTITUTES OF ROMAN LAWen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

14

Downloads(s)

7



Items in SCIDAR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.