Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21036
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPavićević, Aleksandra-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T08:08:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-25T08:08:39Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676231362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21036-
dc.descriptionRad je rezultat naučnoistraživačkog rada autora u okviru Programa istraživanja Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu za 2024. godinu, koji se finansira iz sredstava Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe subject of the work are three interesting institutes of civil law, namely: compensation, complaint of unfulfilled contract and right of retaning possession, which share the common role of private law security of threatened claim and which are carried out using an authentic technique of self-protection. Bilaterally binding debtor-creditor relations in general, including those in the sphere of service law, often in practice suffer from various disturbances of mutual obligations, due to breach of contractual obligations, violation of bona fides, etc. At that time, the creditor was recognized by law with various means in the function of returning the equivalence of mutual benefits, in accordance with the principle of process economy. Since these three institutes have similar spheres of application, as well as certain common elements in their physiognomy, the subject of analysis are certain segments of these legal constructions in domestic and comparative law (concept, characteristics, conditions for establishment and function). The goal of these considerations is to locate the similarities and differences among them, and to formulate an answer to the question - is it the same institute with several subtypes or - different and independent institutes, which must then be precisely demarcated. In the paper, the author with an explanation concludes that these are three independent institutes whose crucial differences are: content, effect, legal nature, object, conditions of creation and termination. Since their relationship is complementary, these institutes should coexist in Serbian future law.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Kragujevacen_US
dc.relation.ispartofXX Majsko savetovanje, MEĐUNARODNA NAUČNA KONFERENCIJA IZAZOVI I OTVORENA PITANjA USLUŽNOG PRAVA, Tom 2en_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectdebtor-creditor relationsen_US
dc.subjectself-protectionen_US
dc.subjectcompensationen_US
dc.subjectcomplaint of unfulfilled contracten_US
dc.subjectIus retentionisen_US
dc.subjectsecurity and settlement of claimsen_US
dc.titleODNOS KOMPENZACIJE, PRIGOVORA NEISPUNjENOG UGOVORA I RETENCIJEen_US
dc.title.alternativeCOMPENSATION, COMPLAINT OF UNFULFILLED CONTRACT AND IUS RETENTIONISen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/XXMajsko2.647Pen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

286

Downloads(s)

12

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Izazovi i otvorena pitanja usluznog prava-tom2-36 647-666.pdf295.82 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons