Молимо вас користите овај идентификатор за цитирање или овај линк до ове ставке:
https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21799
Пун извештај метаподатака
Поље DC-а | Вредност | Језик |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Čanović Spasojević, Jelena | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-11T17:29:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-11T17:29:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788676231409 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21799 | - |
dc.description | Rad je rezultat istraživanja na projektu Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu: „Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije”, koji se finansira iz sredstavaFakulteta. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The subject of the paper is the analysis of the contested application of legal provisions on observance of the time frame for the conduction of civil proceeding. The time frame institute, along with other novelties, was introduced by the Law on Civil Procedure which came into force in 2011, with the intention of improving the efficiency of the trial, limiting the duration of the procedure, better concentration of the procedure, as well as respect to the rights of the parties on a court decision within a reasonable time. The paper analyzes the term, procedural legal basis and content of the time frame institute, as well as the method and criteria for determining of the time frame. In practice, the initially determined time frame is usually often changed. However, a new time frame is determined in accordance with the law and other procedural situations which might happen during the time development of the litigation proceeding (postponement of the hearing, modification of the claim, restitutio in integrum, and subsequent presentation of new facts and evidence). A significant part of the work refers to the determination of responsibility for (non)observance of the time frame, both by the court and by the parties. Considering this, legislators tried to strengthen the judge's responsibility for non-observance of the time frame, thus Civil procedure law stipulates the duty of the court not only to respect the time frame, but also to control the negligent or malicious behavior of the parties. Correspondingly, Law on Judges provides the basis for the judge's disciplinary responsibility by standardizing disciplinary offenses and possible sanction. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | sr | en_US |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | USKLAĐIVANjE PRAVNOG SISTEMA SRBIJE SA STANDARDIMA EVROPSKE UNIJE, Knjiga XII | en_US |
dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject | observance of the time frame | en_US |
dc.subject | method of determining the time frame | en_US |
dc.subject | responsibility for non-observance of the time frame | en_US |
dc.title | (NE)POŠTOVANjE VREMENSKOG OKVIRA ZA SPROVOĐENjE PARNIČNOG POSTUPKA | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | (NON)OBSERVANCE OF THE TIME FRAME FOR THE CONDUCTION OF LITIGATION PROCEEDING | en_US |
dc.type | bookPart | en_US |
dc.description.version | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.46793/UPSSXII.619CS | en_US |
dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | en_US |
Налази се у колекцијама: | Faculty of Law, Kragujevac |
Датотеке у овој ставци:
Датотека | Опис | Величина | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Uskladjivanje pravnog sistema k12-2024-38 619-638.pdf | 298.44 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Погледајте |
Ова ставка је заштићена лиценцом Креативне заједнице