Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/22983
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorČanović Spasojević, Jelena-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-29T17:04:58Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-29T17:04:58Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676231546en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/22983-
dc.descriptionRad je rezultat naučnoistraživačkog rada autora u okviru Programa istraživanja Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu za 2025. godinu, koji se finansira iz sredstava Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the legal rules and standards concerning the conduct of remote court hearings, held via videoconferencing, in civil litigation. In the context of the legal implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, national legal systems have faced an increased need for accelerated digitalization of the judiciary, bringing to the forefront the question of how to ensure that the use of modern technologies in civil proceedings does not result in the restriction of the parties’ procedural rights. The author examines the domestic normative framework, primarily the provisions of the current Civil Procedure Act, and determines the extent to which it enables or limits remote adjudication. The paper then explores relevant European and international standards: the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the CEPEJ Guidelines on the use of videoconferencing in judicial proceedings, the standards of the European Union (the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, EU recommendations and regulations), along with a comparative-law overview illustrating the application of these standards in practice. Special attention is given to the inherent tension between the tendency toward judicial digitalization and the need to preserve guarantees of procedural rights and fundamental principles of civil procedure. The paper also provides recommendations for improving the domestic normative framework, based on European standards, in order to enable the effective use of remote justice while fully respecting all rights encompassed by the notion of a fair trial.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherPravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, Institut za pravne i društvene naukeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofZbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, knjiga IIen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectcivil procedureen_US
dc.subjectremote hearingen_US
dc.subjectvideoconferencingen_US
dc.subjectdomestic normative frameworken_US
dc.subjectEuropean and international standardsen_US
dc.titleODRŽAVANjE ROČIŠTA NA DALjINU U PARNIČNOM POSTUPKU – NORMATIVNI OKVIR REPUBLIKE SRBIJE I MEĐUNARODNI STANDARDIen_US
dc.title.alternativeREMOTE HEARINGS IN CIVIL LITIGATION – THE NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDSen_US
dc.typebookParten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/7623-154.433CSen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Downloads(s)

2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zbornik Radova knj.2-445-468.pdf357.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons