Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/22984Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ilić, Dušan | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-29T17:05:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-29T17:05:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9788676231546 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/22984 | - |
| dc.description | Rad je rezultat naučnoistraživačkog rada autora u okviru Programa istraživanja Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu za 2025. godinu, koji se finansira iz sredstava Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | When an athlete or another person responsible for an anti-doping rule violation provides Sunstantial Assistance to a competent anti-doping organization in uncovering violations of the Code committed by another person, the adjudicatory body is authorized to suspend a portion of the otherwise applicable period of ineligibility. As a rule, No more than three-quarters of the otherwise applicable period of ineligibility may be suspended. Moreover, when the violation in question carries a sanction of lifetime ineligibility, the remaining, non-suspended period of the sanction may not be shorter than eight years. In addition to setting clear limits within which the competent anti-doping organization must operate when determining the period of suspension, the Code also prescribes the criteria on the basis of which such a decision must be made. Accordingly, the adjudicatory body is required to take into account the seriousness of the anti-doping rule violation, as well as the significance of the Substantial Assistance provided by the person responsible for the violation to the effort to eliminate doping in sport. In addition to these two criteria, the jurisprudence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne has developed an additional criterion: when assessing the extent to which the prescribed sanction will be suspended, consideration must also be given to ensuring that the scope of the suspension in the specific case is proportionate to that imposed in earlier decisions. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | sr | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, Institut za pravne i društvene nauke | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, knjiga II | en_US |
| dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | doping | en_US |
| dc.subject | World Anti-Doping Code (WADA Code) | en_US |
| dc.subject | suspension of sanction | en_US |
| dc.subject | Substantial Assistance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Court of Arbitration for Sport - CAS | en_US |
| dc.title | ZNAČAJAN DOPRINOS (SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE) KAO OSNOV ZA REDUKCIJU SANKCIJE PROPISANE ZA KRŠENjE ANTIDOPING PRAVILA: GRANICE I DOMET | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE AS A BASIS FOR REDUCING SANCTIONS FOR ANTI-DOPING RULE VIOLATIONS: SCOPE AND LIMITS | en_US |
| dc.type | bookPart | en_US |
| dc.description.version | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.46793/7623-154.457I | en_US |
| dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Law, Kragujevac | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zbornik Radova knj.2-469-487.pdf | 306.8 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
