Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23210
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMilovanović, Nevena-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-23T14:22:53Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-23T14:22:53Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn3122-8178en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23210-
dc.description.abstractDrawing on Bertolt Brecht’s concept of the dramaturgy of estrangement and Michel Foucault’s concepts of panopticism and biopolitics, this paper examines the mechanisms of power, violence, and control in Sarah Kane’s Blasted. It focuses on the ways in which language, the body, and interpersonal relations are shaped by disciplinary and biopolitical structures, as well as on the ways in which private, political, and wartime violence intersect within the play. Using an analytical-synthetic method, the paper argues that estrangement in Blasted is produced not only through the disruption of theatrical illusion, but also through language and the body as key sites of humiliation, discipline, and the disintegration of subjectivity. Language functions as a domain of classification, sexual labeling, humiliation, normalization, and symbolic violence, while the body becomes the site on which sexual violence, bodily harm, biopolitical control, and loss of identity are most visibly inscribed. In this way, the macro level of war and political violence is reproduced on the micro level of intimate relations, helplessness, and violence against the body. Panoptic mechanisms operate through surveillance, self-control, and the internalization of discipline, whereas a biopolitical perspective shows that the body and sexuality are represented as domains of political regulation, coercion, and control. The paper further argues that in Blasted individual violence cannot be understood separately from broader social and political structures, since private, political, and wartime violence appear as interconnected forms of the same order of power. The conclusion suggests that the final “Thank you” does not signify redemption, but rather marks only a minimal ethical breach within an otherwise devastated world.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFakultet pedagoških nauka Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, Jagodinaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUzdanica: časopis za jezik, književnost i pedagoške naukeen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectKaneen_US
dc.subjectBlasteden_US
dc.subjectestrangementen_US
dc.subjectpanopticismen_US
dc.subjectbiopoliticsen_US
dc.subjectdiscourseen_US
dc.titleDRAMATURGIJA OTUĐENJA, PANOPTICIZAM I BIOPOLITIKA U DRAMI "RAZNESENI" SARE KEJNen_US
dc.title.alternativeTHE DRAMATURGY OF ESTRANGEMENT, PANOPTICISM, AND BIOPOLITICS IN SARAH KANE’S "BLASTED"en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/Uzdanica23.1.291Men_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)




This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons