Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23305
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIvković, Ksenija-
dc.contributor.authorVladimir Đaković-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-29T12:53:15Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-29T12:53:15Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn1450-8338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23305-
dc.descriptionIstraživanje sprovedeno u radu finansiralo je Ministarstvo nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije (Ugovor o prenosu sredstava za finansiranje naučnoistraživačkog rada istraživača na akreditovanim visokoškolskim ustanovama u 2026. godini broj: 451-03-33/2026-03/ 200198).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the translation solutions employed in transferring dialectally marked speech in Zora Neale Hurston’s novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, wherein dialect is observed not merely as a formal linguistic system but as a means of constructing meaning within discourse. The aim of the paper is to determine the ways in which structural dialectal features are reduced in the Serbian translation, as well as whether their communicative and pragmatic functions are simultaneously retained. The analysis shows that the most frequent translation strategies in the novel are neutralization, lexicalization, and colloquialization. These strategies do not represent a loss of the source dialect’s effect, but rather its reconfiguration in accordance with the norms and expectations of the target language. It is concluded that the dialect in translation is realized as a discursive practice through colloquialism, orality, and register markedness, thereby preserving its role in characterization and the shaping of social relations, despite the absence of direct dialectal markers. The translation strategies of neutralization, lexicalization, and colloquialization demonstrate a shift in focus from form to function: the dialect ceases to be a means of precise sociolinguistic differentiation and becomes a method of preserving the impression of orality, emotionality, and informality. Through these procedures, the dialect loses its collective and culturally specific aspects but retains its discursive role in marking relationships between characters and their position within the narrative framework. Thus, the translation does not reproduce African American Vernacular English as a linguistic system but reinterprets it as a stylistic practice adapted to the norms of the Serbian language.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Kragujevcu, Filološko-umetnički fakulteten_US
dc.relation.ispartofLipar, časopis za književnost, jezik, umetnost i kulturuen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjecttranslation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectdiscourseen_US
dc.subjectneutralizationen_US
dc.subjectlexicalizationen_US
dc.subjectcolloquializationen_US
dc.subjectZora Neale Hurstonen_US
dc.titleDIJALEKAT KAO DISKURZIVNA PRAKSA: KONTRASTIVNA ANALIZA ROMANA „OČI SU IM GLEDALE U BOGA ZORE“ NIL HERSTONen_US
dc.title.alternativeDIALECT AS DISCURSIVE PRACTICE: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF ZORA NEALE HURSTON’S NOVEL THEIR EYES WERE WATCHING GODen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/LIPAR90.139Ien_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lipar 90 ZA STAMPU-139-155.pdf157.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons