Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23318
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJerotijevic Tisma, Danica-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-29T14:45:46Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-29T14:45:46Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn1820-1768en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23318-
dc.descriptionThe research conducted in the paper was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (Agreement on the Transfer of Funds for Financing Scientific Research of the Teaching Staff at Accredited Higher Education Institutions in 2026, number: 451-03-34/2026-03/200198.).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs EMI continues to expand across higher education worldwide, understanding instructors’ linguistic needs and pronunciation practices has become increasingly important for ensuring effective teaching in multilingual classroom settings. Hence, the current study investigates EMI prospective instructors’ views on oral communication needs and pronunciation strategy use before, during and after a speaking activity. A total of twenty-two lecturers from eight faculties of the University of Kragujevac, who were attending an EMI training program funded by the Foundation Tempus, completed two questionnaires related to the explored issues. The results of the relevant statistical testing show that the instructors understand the importance of oral communication skills, especially clarity, confidence and effective presentation delivery. However, more experienced instructors rated speaking abilities lower and reported a reduced use of pre-speaking pronunciation strategies when compared to less experienced colleagues. No significant group differences were found for strategies used during and after the speaking activities, yet the reflective strategies were consistently low across all participants. The findings indicate that even though EMI trainees recognize the importance of intelligible communication, they differ in confidence and strategies employed. The pedagogical implications of the study highlight the need for structured pronunciation training on suprasegmentals and reflective strategy use in future EMI training programs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Kragujevcu, Filološko-umetnički fakulteten_US
dc.relation.ispartofNasleđe: časopis za književnost, jezik i kulturuen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectEMIen_US
dc.subjectpronunciationen_US
dc.subjectNNESen_US
dc.subjectpronunciation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectspeakingen_US
dc.subjectteaching experienceen_US
dc.titlePRONUNCIATION STRATEGIES AND ORAL COMMUNICATION NEEDS OF THE PROSPECTIVE EMI INSTRUCTORS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KRAGUJEVACen_US
dc.title.alternativeSTRATEGIJE IZGOVORA I POTREBE USMENE KOMUNIKACIJE KOD BUDUĆIH PREDAVAČA UNIVERZITETSKE NASTAVE NA ENGLESKOM JEZIKUen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/NasKg2663.225JTen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NASLEDJE 63-225-240.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons