Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8511
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseopenAccess-
dc.contributor.authorMilosavljevic, Milos-
dc.contributor.authorJankovic, Slobodan-
dc.contributor.authorPejcic, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorMilovanovic, Jasmina-
dc.contributor.authorOpančina V.-
dc.contributor.authorKostic M.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-19T15:57:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-19T15:57:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0042-8450-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8511-
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved. Background/Aim. Reslizumab is humanized monoclonal antibody produced by recombinant DNA technology which binds to circulating interleukin-5 (IL-5) and down-regulates the IL-5 signaling pathway. Reslizumab is indicated for the add-on maintenance treatment of patients 18 years and older with severe eosinophilic asthma phenotype whose symptoms were inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of reslizumab compared to placebo in patients suffering from inadequately controlled, moderateto- severe asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts. Methods. Our meta-analysis was based on systematic search of literature and selection of high-quality evidence according to pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. The effects of reslizumab and placebo were summarized using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3.5 and heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochrane Q test and I2 values. Several types of bias were assessed and publication bias shown by Funnel plot and Egger’s regression. Results. The meta-analysis included 5 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg produced substantial improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1. second (FEV 1) (mean difference 0.15 [0.10, 0.21]) and in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mean difference 0.21 [0.09, 0.32]) over the 15 or 16-week treatment period, substantial decrease versus placebo in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score (mean difference -0.28 [-0.41, -0.16]), and substantial increase vs. placebo from baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) total score (mean difference 0.24 [0.06, 0.43]). Also, reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg caused less adverse events versus placebo (OR 0.67 [0.51, 0.88]), especially asthma worsening (OR 0.53 [0.36, 0.77]) or bronchitis (OR 0.42 [0.24, 0.74]). Conclusion. On the basis of published clinical trials reslizumab could be considered as an effective and safe therapeutic option for severe, poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma for the time being.-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceVojnosanitetski Pregled-
dc.titleReslizumab versus placebo for poorly controlled, severe eosinophilic asthma: Meta-analysis-
dc.typearticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/VSP161124013M-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85055590210-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

497

Downloads(s)

17

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.2298-VSP161124013M.pdf2.12 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons