Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12402
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMrdakovic V.-
dc.contributor.authorIlić Komatina D.-
dc.contributor.authorVulovic R.-
dc.contributor.authorMatic M.-
dc.contributor.authorJankovic, Novica-
dc.contributor.authorFilipovic, Nenad-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T20:44:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-20T20:44:55Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1509-409X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12402-
dc.description.abstract© 2014, Institute of Machine Design and Operation. All rights reserved. Understanding leg and joint stiffness adjustment during maximum hopping may provide important information for developing more effective training methods. It has been reported that ankle stiffness has major influence on stable spring-mass dynamics during submaximal hopping, and that knee stiffness is a major determinant for hopping performance during maximal hopping task. Furthermore, there are no reports on how the height of the previous hop could affect overall stiffness modulation of the subsequent maximum one. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether and how the jump height of the previous hop affects leg and joint stiffness for subsequent maximum hop. Ten participants completed trials in which they repeatedly hopped as high as possible (MX task) and trials in which they were instructed to perform several maximum hops with 3 preferred (optimal) height hops between each of them (P3MX task). Both hopping tasks were performed at 2.2 Hz hopping frequency and at the participant’s preferred (freely chosen) frequency as well. By comparing results of those hopping tasks, we found that ankle stiffness at 2.2 Hz (p = 0.041) and knee stiffness at preferred frequency (p = 0.045) was significantly greater for MX versus P3MX tasks. Leg stiffness for 2.2 Hz hopping is greater than for the preferred frequency. Ankle stiffness is greater for 2.2 Hz than for preferred frequencies; opposite stands for knee stiffness. The results of this study suggest that preparatory hop height can be considered as an important factor for modulation of maximum hop.-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.sourceActa of Bioengineering and Biomechanics-
dc.titleLeg stiffness adjustment during hopping at different intensities and frequencies-
dc.typearticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.5277/abb140308-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84929917997-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

149

Downloads(s)

6

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PaperMissing.pdf
  Restricted Access
29.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in SCIDAR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.