Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12659
Title: Synthesis, characterization, HSA/DNA interactions and antitumor activity of new [Ru(η<sup>6</sup>-p-cymene)Cl<inf>2</inf>(L)] complexes
Authors: Djukić, Maja
Jeremić, Marija
Filipović, Ignjat
Klisuric, Olivera
Kojić, Vesna
Jakimov, Dimitar
Jelic, Ratomir
Onnis, Valentina
Matović, Zoran
Issue Date: 2020
Abstract: Three new ruthenium(II) complexes were synthesized from different substituted isothiazole ligands 5-(methylamino)-3-pyrrolidine-1-ylisothiazole-4-carbonitrile (1), 5-(methylamino)-3-(4-methylpiperazine-1-yl)isothiazole-4-carbonitrile (2) and 5-(methylamino)-3-morpholine-4-ylisothiazole-4-carbonitrile (3): [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl2(L1)]·H2O (4), [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl2(L2)] (5) and [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl2(L3)] (6). All complexes were characterized by IR, UV–Vis, NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. The molecular structures of all ligands and complexes 4 and 6 were determined by an X-ray. The results of the interactions of CT-DNA (calf thymus deoxyribonucleic acid) and HSA (human serum albumin) with ruthenium (II) complexes reveal that complex 4 binds well to CT-DNA and HSA. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the reaction between complex and HSA confirmed the associative mode of interaction. The results of Quantum mechanics (QM) modelling and docking experiments toward DNA dodecamer and HSA support the strongest binding of the complex 4 to DNA major groove, as well as its binding to IIa domain of HSA with the lowest ΔG energy, which agrees with the solution studies. The modified GOLD docking results are indicative for Ru(p-cymene)LCl··(HSA··GLU292) binding and GOLD/MOPAC(QM) docking/modelling of DNA/Ligand (Ru(II)-N(7)dG7) covalent binding. The cytotoxic activity of compounds was evaluated by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay. Neither of the tested compounds shows activity against a healthy MRC-5 cell line while the MCF-7 cell line is the most sensitive to all. Compounds 3, 4 and 5 were about two times more active than cisplatin, while the antiproliferative activity of 6 was almost the same as with cisplatin. Flow cytometry analysis showed the apoptotic death of the cells with a cell cycle arrest in the subG1 phase.
URI: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12659
Type: article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111256
ISSN: 0162-0134
SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85091679750
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac
Faculty of Science, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

823

Downloads(s)

63

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1016-j.jinorgbio.2020.111256.pdf2.36 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons