Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14894
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenserestrictedAccess-
dc.contributor.authorMilasinovic M.-
dc.contributor.authorProdanovic, Dusan-
dc.contributor.authorStanić, Marija-
dc.contributor.authorZindovic, Budo-
dc.contributor.authorStojanović, Boban-
dc.contributor.authorMilivojevic N.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T11:29:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-13T11:29:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1464-7141-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14894-
dc.description.abstractReliable water resources management requires decision support tools to successfully forecast hydraulic data (stage and flow hydrographs). Even though data-driven methods are nowadays trendy to apply, they still fail to provide reliable forecasts during extreme periods due to a lack of training data. Therefore, model-driven forecasting is still needed. However, the model-driven forecasting approach is affected by numerous uncertainties in initial and boundary conditions. To improve the real-time model’s operation, it can be regularly updated using measured data in the data assimilation (DA) procedure. Widely used DA techniques are computationally expensive, which reduce their real-time applications. Previous research shows that tailor-made, time-efficient DA methods based on the control theory could be used instead. This paper presents further insights into the control theory-based DA for 1D hydraulic models. This method uses Proportional–Integrative–Derivative (PID) controllers to assimilate computed water levels and observed data. This paper describes the two-stage PID controllers’ tuning procedure. Multi-objective optimization by Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was used to determine optimal parameters for PID controllers. The proposed tuning procedure is tested on a hydraulic model used as a decision support tool for the transboundary Iron Gate 1 hydropower system on the Danube River, showing that the average discrepancy between modeled and observed water levels can be less than 0.05 m for more than 97% of assimilation window.-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess-
dc.sourceJournal of Hydroinformatics-
dc.titleControl theory-based data assimilation for open channel hydraulic models: tuning PID controllers using multi-objective optimization-
dc.typearticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2166/hydro.2022.034-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136207571-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Science, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

410

Downloads(s)

8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PaperMissing.pdf
  Restricted Access
29.85 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in SCIDAR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.