Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/15286
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND-
dc.contributor.authorPavlović, Marko-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-08T21:48:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-08T21:48:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.isbn9788676231164en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/15286-
dc.descriptionRad je rezultat istraživanja na projektu Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Kragujevcu: „Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije”, koji se finansira iz sredstava Fakulteta.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe article starts with a terminological construction error. The Creator of the presumption of innocence came to the definition of this institute by replacing the word good with the word innocent in the papal expression that „at first glance, everyone is presumed good, until proven to the contrary“. The construction error is made from the standpoint of anthropological optimism, which is itself a one-sided philosophical approach. The article analyzes the institutes that are considered as elements of the presumption of innocence: the burden of proof, the „ten-to-one rule“ („the numerical expression of the presumption of innocence“), the right of the accused to remain silent. In the article is also analyzed coercive measures that ribut the presumption of innocence, including detention and the ban on practicing a profession from Art. 132a of the German CPC. The author concludes that the presumption of innocence is an institute without its procedural content, that it has absorbed institutes that existed before it with a kind of imperialism, that it may be harmful to judicial justice, and that therefore the institute of the presumption of innocence should be abandoned. The institutions „actori in cumbit probatio“, „in dubio pro reo“ and „proved beyond reasonable doubt“, as well as the already existing responsibility of officials, victims and the public for illegal actions, are sufficient guarantees for a fair trial.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Kragujevacen_US
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.sourceUSKLAĐIVANjE PRAVNOG SISTEMA SRBIJE SA STANDARDIMA EVROPSKE UNIJE, knjiga 10en_US
dc.subjectpresumptive innocenceen_US
dc.subjectpolice and prosecutionen_US
dc.subjectthe judgeen_US
dc.subjectunofficial personsen_US
dc.subject"ten-to-one rule"en_US
dc.titleDEFEKTI PRETPOSTAVKE NEVINOSTIen_US
dc.title.alternativeDEFECTS OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCEen_US
dc.typebookParten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/UPSSX.003Pen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

88

Downloads(s)

24

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11. Uskladjivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije knj. 10-15-860-3-17.pdf253.37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons