Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19992
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorĐurđevic, Đorđe-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T11:46:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-24T11:46:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationЂорђе Ђурђевић, Ангелологија као поетски оквир еротологије Милоша Црњанског, Милош Црњански – романтични анархист 20. века, Зборник радова са међународног научног скупа одржаног 12 априла 2019. године на Универзитету „Етвеш Лоранд” у Будимпешти, Будимпешта: Смер за српски језик и књижевност Одсека за словенскку филологију Филозофског факултета Универзитета „Етвеш Лоранд”, 2020. стр. 26–38.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-963-489-190-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19992-
dc.descriptionMiloš Crnjanski – romantični anarhist 20. veka, Zbornik radova sa međunarodnog naučnog skupa održanog 12 aprila 2019. godine na Univerzitetu „Etveš Lorand” u Budimpeštien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this work we are analyzing Crnjanski’s novel The Journal of Čarnojević through the aspect of its epistolar form traces. In the first excerpt of this novel, published a year before the novel was published, central episode of a novel was made in a form of a letter written to an unkown friend. This letter-form was removed in the first and all of the other editions, but not completely. Epistolar traces were left on purpose with a new symbolic intention, to present a deconstruction of romantic subject and creation of a modern literary character at its place. Crnjanski’s modern hero is made as a pollyvalent, unnameable subject, which could not be held in positions of traditional narrative, as a narrator, letter sender, nor the narration itself could be presented as a writing to someone specific, who could have a role of an adressee. These two positions are constantly mixing, so sender is becoming adressee and adressee is becoming sender. In this circle, figure of a double fails to achieve its goal and become totally separated, so the Other, as a metaphysical presence doesn’t exist, although narrator is constantly trying to make this existence possible. Numerous multiplications of a double which are caused by this opsessive desire to create the Other become a line of symbolic failures, so the narrator is turning to metaphysical spaces of nature (sumatraistic spaces) who are available as visual presences, but could not be made discursively formed. In theese spaces he finds, at the sime time, onthological comfort, but also hios death, as theese spaces simoultanously exist and don’t exist, so he remains in a state of a metaphysical dilemma, which is a basic state of modern literary subjects.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherFilozofski fakultet Univerziteta „Etveš Lorand“ Budimpeštaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.sourceMiloš Crnjanski – romantični anarhist 20. veka-
dc.subjectdoubleen_US
dc.subjectletteren_US
dc.subjectThe Journal of Čarnojevićen_US
dc.subjectsenderen_US
dc.subjectadresseen_US
dc.subjectmirroren_US
dc.subjectwindowen_US
dc.titleAngelologija kao poetski okvir erotologije Miloša Crnjanskogen_US
dc.title.alternative“WHO AM I WRITING TO?” – FUNCTION OF EPISTOLARY IN THE JOURNAL OF ČARNOJEVIĆ BY MILOŠ CRNJANSKIen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)

Page views(s)

319

Downloads(s)

9

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ELTE2019WEB str.71.pdf383.56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in SCIDAR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.