Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/22888
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKomatina, Nikola-
dc.contributor.authorMarinković, Dragan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T09:01:20Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-31T09:01:20Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn2958-3519en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/22888-
dc.description.abstractEfficient management of production processes in modern manufacturing depends on the timely identification of their most critical phases, as such recognition directly enhances process reliability, productivity, and product quality. To address this need, an objective multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) framework has been developed by integrating the Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method with Pareto analysis, a well-established approach also referred to as ABC classification. Within this framework, a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria was determined in collaboration with a Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) team from a Tier-1 automotive manufacturer. The decision matrix was constructed from data extracted from PFMEA reports that had been subjected to preliminary statistical processing to ensure robustness and comparability. The relative importance of the criteria was then established using the CRITIC method, which objectively derives weights from statistical indicators such as the arithmetic mean, standard deviation, and inter-criteria correlation coefficients. The framework was subsequently applied to the PFMEA report for a rear axle assembly process, encompassing 16 discrete production phases. Pareto analysis was employed to classify the phases according to their criticality, thereby enabling a systematic prioritization of process risks. The resulting classification demonstrated strong consistency with expert evaluations and was confirmed to reflect real-world production conditions accurately. Beyond confirming methodological validity, the findings underscore the advantages of employing a fully objective weighting mechanism combined with a widely recognized prioritization tool, thereby offering a transparent and replicable basis for decision-making in complex manufacturing contexts. This integration not only supports continuous improvement and risk mitigation but also provides a scalable framework applicable to a broad range of industrial processes where critical phase identification is essential.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherACADloreen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCriteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlationen_US
dc.subjectPareto analysisen_US
dc.subjectProcess Failure Mode and Effects Analysisen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectMulti-attribute decision-makingen_US
dc.titleAn Objective Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Framework for Identifying Critical Phases in Automotive Component Manufacturingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.56578/jemse050101en_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

59

Downloads(s)

29

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JEMSE_05.01_01.pdf513.97 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons