Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23320
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNenadić, Marija-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-29T14:46:42Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-29T14:46:42Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn1820-1768en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23320-
dc.descriptionIstraživanje sprovedeno u radu finansiralo je Ministarstvo nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije (Ugovor o prenosu sredstava za finansiranje naučnoistraživačkog rada istraživača na akreditovanim visokoškolskim ustanovama u 2026. godini broj: 451-03-33/2026-03/ 200198.).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a semantic-pragmatic analysis of the lexeme fazon within the framework of the Relevance Theory. The study has two primary aims: (1) to determine the type of encoded meaning associated with the lexeme, distinguishing between conceptual and procedural semantics, and (2) to establish the communicative level at which the expression operates, i.e. whether it contributes to explicit or implicit communication. The analysis is based on data extracted from the CLARIN corpus, which contains 3843 instances of the lexeme fazon. While the majority of occurrences exhibit conceptual meaning (e.g. style, trick), a subset of 15 examples displays procedural meaning. Within this subset, 10 instances express approximation (about, roughly), and 5 express exemplification (for example). The procedural meaning of approximation is realized exclusively through the independent use of the lexeme fazon, whereas the procedural meaning of exemplification is manifested through three syntactic constructions: (1) independent use of fazon, (2) the pragmatic cluster kao fazon, and (3) the pragmatic cluster ono fazon. A shared characteristic of these procedural encodings is their function in weakening explicitly communicated content by guiding interpretation towards approximate or typical values within the propositional scope.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Kragujevcu, Filološko-umetnički fakulteten_US
dc.relation.ispartofNasleđe: časopis za književnost, jezik i kulturuen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectRelevance Theoryen_US
dc.subjectprocedural semanticsen_US
dc.subjectapproximationen_US
dc.subjectexemplificationen_US
dc.subjectweak explicatureen_US
dc.subjectfazonen_US
dc.titleLEKSIKOGRAFSKI NEOBRAĐENA ZNAČENJA LEKSEME „FAZON“: KONCEPTUALNO-PROCEDURALNA DIHOTOMIJAen_US
dc.title.alternativeLEXICOGRAPHICALLY UNDESCRIBED MEANINGS OF THE LEXEME FAZON: THE CONCEPTUAL-PROCEDURAL DISTINCTIONen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.46793/NasKg2663.287Nen_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:The Faculty of Philology and Arts, Kragujevac (FILUM)


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NASLEDJE 63-287-298.pdf1.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons