1. University of Kragujevac Digital Archive
  2. University of Kragujevac
  3. Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21559
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKostic, Nenad-
dc.contributor.authorPetrovic, Nenad-
dc.contributor.authorVesna, Marjanović-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-20T12:27:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-20T12:27:16Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-6335-055-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21559-
dc.descriptionThis paper is a result of the TR32036 and TR33015 projects, which are investigations of the Technological Development of Republic of Serbia. The projects are titled “Development of software for solving the coupled multi-physical problems” and “Research and development of a Serbian net-zero energy house” respectively. We would like to thank to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for their financial support during this investigation.en_US
dc.description.abstractMost research to date which covers the topic of truss structural optimization either doesn’t consider, or uses fixed constraints for buckling. This paper presents a comparison of truss structural optimization types with and without the use of Euler buckling dynamic constraints. The difference is presented on a standard test model with 17 bars using continuous variables for cross section and node positions. The optimization method used is genetic algorithm for optimizing sizing, shape, topology, and their combinations. The implementation of dynamic constraints significantly increases the complexity of the calculations, however the results of using such an approach leads to practically applicable results.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relationTR32036, TR33015en_US
dc.subjectDynamic constraintsen_US
dc.subjectEuler bucklingen_US
dc.subjectGenetic algorithmen_US
dc.subjectStructural optimizationen_US
dc.subjectTrussen_US
dc.titleA COMPARISON OF TRUSS STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION TYPES WITH AND WITHOUT BUCKLING DYNAMIC CONSTRAINTSen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.conference4th International Scientific Conference - Conferenec on Mechanical Engineering Technologies and Applications - COMETa 2018en_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

103

Downloads(s)

2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
M33_COMETa_Petrovic.pdf479.1 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


Items in SCIDAR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.