Молимо вас користите овај идентификатор за цитирање или овај линк до ове ставке:
https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21559
Пун извештај метаподатака
Поље DC-а | Вредност | Језик |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kostic, Nenad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Petrovic, Nenad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vesna, Marjanović | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-20T12:27:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-20T12:27:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-86-6335-055-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/21559 | - |
dc.description | This paper is a result of the TR32036 and TR33015 projects, which are investigations of the Technological Development of Republic of Serbia. The projects are titled “Development of software for solving the coupled multi-physical problems” and “Research and development of a Serbian net-zero energy house” respectively. We would like to thank to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for their financial support during this investigation. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Most research to date which covers the topic of truss structural optimization either doesn’t consider, or uses fixed constraints for buckling. This paper presents a comparison of truss structural optimization types with and without the use of Euler buckling dynamic constraints. The difference is presented on a standard test model with 17 bars using continuous variables for cross section and node positions. The optimization method used is genetic algorithm for optimizing sizing, shape, topology, and their combinations. The implementation of dynamic constraints significantly increases the complexity of the calculations, however the results of using such an approach leads to practically applicable results. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation | TR32036, TR33015 | en_US |
dc.subject | Dynamic constraints | en_US |
dc.subject | Euler buckling | en_US |
dc.subject | Genetic algorithm | en_US |
dc.subject | Structural optimization | en_US |
dc.subject | Truss | en_US |
dc.title | A COMPARISON OF TRUSS STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION TYPES WITH AND WITHOUT BUCKLING DYNAMIC CONSTRAINTS | en_US |
dc.type | conferenceObject | en_US |
dc.description.version | Published | en_US |
dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.conference | 4th International Scientific Conference - Conferenec on Mechanical Engineering Technologies and Applications - COMETa 2018 | en_US |
Налази се у колекцијама: | Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac |
Датотеке у овој ставци:
Датотека | Опис | Величина | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M33_COMETa_Petrovic.pdf | 479.1 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Погледајте |
Ставке на SCIDAR-у су заштићене ауторским правима, са свим правима задржаним, осим ако није другачије назначено.