Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23134
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKomatina, Nikola-
dc.contributor.authorPetrović, Nikola-
dc.contributor.authorPamucar, Dragan-
dc.contributor.authorSimic, Vladimir-
dc.contributor.authorMarinković, Dragan-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-14T08:43:00Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-14T08:43:00Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn0354-2025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://scidar.kg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/23134-
dc.descriptionDostupno na: https://casopisi.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/FUMechEng/article/view/14609en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework for the evaluation and ranking of industrial punch presses based on their operational performance. The case study was conducted in a company engaged in the production of industrial machines and assemblies. For the first time, the Square-Root based Evaluation Method (SREM) is introduced and applied, aiming to overcome certain limitations of MCDM methods based on linear data normalization. The SREM method introduces a combined nonlinear transformation approach based on square and root transformations. Unlike standard approaches, it employs a fusion of these two transformations, thereby enabling decision makers to balance between emphasizing excellent (extreme) alternative values with respect to a given criterion and achieving ranking stability by reducing the influence of such alternatives. The former is achieved through the square transformation, while the latter is attained through the root transformation. The results obtained using the SREM method were compared with those derived from the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods under three different scenarios, i.e., varying criterion weights. The comparative analysis confirmed the robustness of the SREM method. The results further indicate that SREM provides flexibility and inherently incorporates sensitivity analysis, which can be highly valuable in practice, as problem analysis does not require the application of multiple MCDM methods.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nišen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFacta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectMCDMen_US
dc.subjectPunch pressesen_US
dc.subjectOperational performanceen_US
dc.subjectSREMen_US
dc.subjectSquare transformationen_US
dc.subjectRoot transformationen_US
dc.titleMulti-Criteria Ranking of Industrial Presses with Respect to Operational Performance Using the Square-Root based Evaluation Method (SREM)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versionAccepted for publishingen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22190/FUME260305009Ken_US
dc.type.versionPublishedVersionen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Engineering, Kragujevac

Page views(s)

15

Downloads(s)

1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
14609-72650-1-PB.pdf804.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons